Gillard unveils Labor OHS policy



A Labor Federal Government would seek to accelerate harmonisation of OHS and workers’ compensation regulation through a more empowered national body and financial incentives to the states and territories to adopt reforms. The concept of ‘cooperative federalism’ is proposed in distinction to the Liberal Government approach of ‘aspirational nationalism’.

The Shadow Workplace Relations Minister, Julia Gillard, this week unveiled these measures as part of the policy of the Labor Party on OHS, at a Safety Institute of Australia seminar in Melbourne.

The key elements of the policy are:

Ms Gillard referred to the ’slippery slope of migration to Comcare’ as a move by stealth towards a national system, without addressing the fundamentals needed to make such a system work. The Labor policy is said to support national uniformity while addressing those fundamentals.

The very similar position of the ACTU was put at the same seminar by Jarrod Moran who noted that the ACTU is not against a national system in principle, but that Comcare is an inappropriate vehicle for it. The ACTU would want to see a national system built ‘from the ground up’ through a lengthy consultative process.

Significantly, this policy will not require legislation to implement other than as necessary to empower the central body. It will, however, rely on cooperation between all governments, supported by all stakeholders—industry, unions and the professions. Political and parochial interests will need to be subdued for this to work. Current slow progress through the Australian Safety and Compensation Council suggests that this will not be easily achieved.

Process employed over the last decade or more towards harmonisation have demonstrated that there is considerable ‘devil in the detail’ and the process of tripartite consultation can be a lengthy and unfruitful one. This policy does not suggest a move toward the more blunt instrument of legislation, although it does not close the door on that.

Implications for employers

This policy confirms there is bipartisan agreement in principle to the need for harmonisation, to reduce confusion and administrative burdens on employers. The parties effectively differ only as to the means by which this will be achieved.

Significantly, the policy leaves open the potential for a national system to be introduced if harmonisation is not achieved through cooperation.

Employers operating across state boundaries will ultimately benefit from a reduction in ’red tape‘, while workers will have the same rights and protections wherever they may be.

Importantly, true harmonisation cannot occur without a softening of the more severe elements of some legislation, most notably overturning the reverse onus of proof in New South Wales where companies and officers are guilty unless they prove themselves innocent.

The rate of progress and the outcomes achieved in the harmonisation process will depend on the level of drive and participation of the stakeholders. Employers can influence this directly or through industry associations.

For more information on the policies of the parties or the various initiatives currently in place for the harmonisation of OHS and workers’ compensation legislation please contact



Name : Barry Sherriff
Title : Partner
Office : Melbourne
Phone : +61 3 9288 1462
Fax : +61 3 9288 1567
Email : barry.sherriff@freehills.com

This article provides a summary only of the subject matter covered, without the assumption of a duty of care by Freehills or Freehills Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys. The summary is not intended to be nor should it be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other professional advice.

Copyright in this article is owned by Freehills or Freehills Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys. For permission to reproduce articles, please contact Freehills' Public Affairs Coordinator, Megan Williams, on 61 3 9288 1132.